Alcohol trade to use for excise tax cost deferment


NOMPU SIZIBA: A authorized tax professional is warning that, if the alcohol ban shouldn’t be lifted come the center of February, jobs can be completely at stake. He’s additionally warning that Sars might should afford the alcohol retail trade some grace time when it comes to paying excise duties, provided that they haven’t been ready to promote and make income. And, after all, this is able to are available gentle of the truth that the taxman has once more been disadvantaged of tax income from the alcohol trade, owing to the third ban on the trade since final yr.

Moneyweb InsiderINSIDERGOLD

Subscribe for full entry to all our share and unit belief knowledge instruments, our award-winning articles, and assist high quality journalism within the course of.

Effectively, to debate these and associated issues additional, I’m joined on the road by Bernard Mofokeng. He’s a tax lawyer at CMS RM Companions. Thanks a lot, Bernard, for becoming a member of us. Please give us some context. How a lot tax income did the taxman lose from the primary two alcohol bans final yr, and the way a lot is it set to lose with this newest one, assuming that it’s lifted in the course of February?

BERNARD MOFOKENG: Thanks. If you happen to can bear in mind, with the primary one they’ve estimated that it misplaced about R2.5 billion, we estimated, and this was for the primary and second. And it’s estimated that comparable quantities can be misplaced for this era of the ban, and it could be larger as a result of it was the festive season.

NOMPU SIZIBA: Sure, certainly. Now, with Sars already weak, provided that the financial system is extraordinarily weak, companies are barely functioning, extra individuals are unemployed, and with the alcohol ban along with all of this, you’re suggesting that Sars will now possible have to provide the alcohol trade an extra grace interval when it comes to paying excise duties. That they had to do this final yr. Please elaborate for us.

BERNARD MOFOKENG: Effectively, with the primary two bans Sars gave the trade a deferment on their taxes as much as October 31. So it’s logical that, in the event that they gave them these deferments for these bans, they need to do the identical for this one. So I don’t see how they can’t give them the deferment, contemplating that they don’t seem to be incomes revenue, and it’ll have an effect on their cashflow going ahead.

NOMPU SIZIBA: Sure. It is smart. Now, if we assume that the Coronavirus instances worsen and the federal government continues to ban alcohol previous mid-February, what are a few of your fears in regards to the sustainability of the trade, primary, and the broader ramifications of such a call?

BERNARD MOFOKENG: It continues. The ramification for the trade goes to be enormous, as a result of what I’ve heard is that there are going to be some job losses. SAB is pondering that they’re going to chop some jobs. And it appears they’re simply confirming that they may do it.

And likewise, down the road, down the chain, different individuals are going to be affected – the small-time wholesalers can be affected, in addition to the individuals working for these wholesalers. If that’s the case, income goes to be misplaced to the fiscus, which can have an effect on authorities’s price range and authorities spending, and not directly they’re additionally preventing the pandemic.

NOMPU SIZIBA: Legally, what are the newest actions in opposition to the ban? Actually, is there any chance of overturning the choice earlier than mid-February, given the motivation behind it, which is a noble and comprehensible one – that’s, we don’t need to load our trauma models with pointless accidents and issues which are related to alcohol consumption.

BERNARD MOFOKENG: With the courts, something can occur. They might succeed or they might not succeed. However, contemplating the circumstances, I feel the federal government has a superb case. And on this case, the trade itself shouldn’t be united, as a result of it’s solely SAB that’s difficult it. The opposite trade gamers are additionally difficult it. So if the trade is split, it additionally causes an issue for the trade itself to argue that the ban shouldn’t be helpful for the trade, it’s not good, and doesn’t assist in controlling the pandemic. So it will have been higher if the trade was united as a complete.

NOMPU SIZIBA: Sure. So, out of your perspective as a lawyer, what’s it that you just’re advising your purchasers who’re within the alcohol trade proper now?

BERNARD MOFOKENG: First, they need to method Sars and clarify to them their predicament and their cashflow issues, and request the deferment and for Sars to contemplate their circumstances and so forth. Nonetheless, they’ve to have a look at their tax compliance document and, going ahead, the way it’s  going to have an effect on their companies and the way they will contribute to SA’s taxes.

NOMPU SIZIBA: Sure. And mainly Sars – you may’t get blood out of a stone on the finish of the day. I suppose they’re going to should concede.

BERNARD MOFOKENG: To date Sars has been cheap. It has been speaking to the trade, understanding their wants and their challenges, and I feel it’s going to proceed to take action.

NOMPU SIZIBA: Tremendous. Bernard, thanks very a lot for giving us some insights on this explicit topic. That was Bernard Mofokeng. He’s a tax lawyer at CMS RM Companions.