Mayor Phil Goff says the hack was ‘theft’ directed at a household e-mail account.
Phil Goff says he suspects monetary greed slightly than any political objectives motivated an alleged hack on his family email account.
“There’s nothing that I do to keep away from accountability,” the Auckland mayor stated on Saturday when requested if he might guarantee individuals the Xtra account was not used for council enterprise.
The mayor stated police have been nonetheless investigating the alleged hack and taking the matter “notably critically”.
Goff stated many of the emails have been “of little or no significance”.
* Police investigating after claims Auckland Mayor Phil Goff’s personal emails hacked
* ‘Hack’ or no hack, accessing a computer system without authorisation carries risk
* Phil Goff must submit hacked emails to independent investigators, says John Banks
The mayor described the account as a household account and stated he’d used it for some marketing campaign materials distinct from council enterprise.
Mayoral candidates listed their e-mail addresses on an Election Companies public doc at final 12 months’s native elections.
None of the 53 candidates from final 12 months’s Auckland native elections who made e-mail addresses publicly out there, together with Goff, used council or enterprise e-mail addresses on the doc.
Goff stated hacking was theft and experiences the alleged hacker sought cash for the emails instructed a “widespread felony” was concerned.
Goff on Saturday stated generally different individuals had chosen to contact him on the Xtra account.
“In fact they ship stuff to me on my residence e-mail slightly than council e-mail.”
Former mayor John Banks final weekend called for an inquiry into Goff’s use of a personal e-mail account.
Banks questioned if Goff used the e-mail account to evade scrutiny of the Native Authorities Official Info and Conferences Act.
The Weekend Herald beforehand reported the emails lined a 12-year interval and have been “supplied with a $20,000 price ticket and seem to include deeply private data alongside council and Parliamentary work”.
The newspaper stated it could not purchase the database and had ceased contact with the one who claimed to have the e-mail trove.