‘Authorities seems to be leveraging the pandemic to suppress dissent’.
First printed in GroundUp.
This month, the Ministry of Cooperative Governance and Conventional Affairs (COGTA) printed up to date rules with amendments to the December and January adjusted alert degree three lockdown.
Plenty of measures geared toward stopping the unfold of Covid-19 have been relaxed, together with bans on gatherings at faith-based establishments. But, there have been no updates to the rules on “political gatherings”, which have been explicitly banned beneath the January rules.
The silence on “political gatherings” means that the ban stays in pressure. A ban on “political gatherings” negatively impacts the constitutional proper to protest as enshrined in part 17 of the Structure.
Many individuals in South Africa nonetheless search to train their proper to assemble peacefully however have been warned in opposition to doing so, citing the present rules.
But, different kinds of gatherings are permitted, for instance as much as 100 folks could congregate at a public swimming pool, the place sporting a face masks is nearly inconceivable and bodily distancing will be tough.
On three February 2021, the Meals Alliance Union approached the Tshwane Municipality to offer discover of a protest when it comes to part three of the Regulation of Gatherings Act. The Union meant to submit a memorandum of calls for to the workplace of the Presidency on the Union Buildings masking their issues in regards to the lockdown provisions which have affected their members’ lives and livelihoods. In a number of phrases, the accountable officer on the municipality wrote again to the convener informing him that “gatherings are nonetheless prohibited” beneath the January rules.
However days later, on 11 February, 50 members of Parliament gathered to hearken to the President ship the State Nation of Deal with (Sona). This was, by all appearances, a “political gathering”. Authorities’s coverage, rules, actions, failure and commitments have been being unpacked. The attendees represented totally different political events.
As soon as once more, on 16 February, quite a lot of Members of Parliament from numerous political events gathered to reply to and debate the President’s handle.
The prohibition of “political gatherings” is illogical and irrational, extra particularly if folks can collect at a public seashore or swimming pool, however are instantly criminalised after they collect to problem the federal government. It ought to actually be a priority when a democratic authorities criminalises a basic proper that folks use as a final resort to specific their views.
The ban on “political gatherings” have to be lifted if we’re to correctly replicate the essential tenets of our democracy, notably in mild of part 17 of the Structure.
The prohibition is just not that shocking given the federal government’s historical past of intolerance round protest motion. Typically protesters face arbitrary arrest; many are met with police brutality. Presently, we’re being denied this proper completely. This consists of protests that will give the federal government a clearer thought of what’s occurring on the bottom and what folks want so as to assist combat Covid-19.
However the authorities seems to be leveraging the pandemic to suppress dissent. The prohibition on “political gatherings” is shutting folks even additional out of the political decision-making course of within the title of a world pandemic.
We recognize that the present rules are in place to curb the unfold of Covid-19, however our legal guidelines (even the lockdown rules) have to be rational. It’s irrational that 100 folks can collect at out of doors venues for leisure actions, however the identical variety of persons are prohibited from exercising a constitutionally assured proper to protest.
The Right2Protest Challenge (R2P) has written to COGTA, requesting it to assessment the present rules to recognise and promote the democratic proper to protest by uplifting the ban on “political gatherings”. DM
Stanley Malematja is the lawyer within the Right2Protest Challenge based mostly on the Centre for Utilized Authorized Research, Wits College.
Views expressed are usually not essentially these of GroundUp.
Info pertaining to Covid-19, vaccines, learn how to management the unfold of the virus and potential remedies is ever-changing. Underneath the South African Catastrophe Administration Act Regulation 11(5)(c) it’s prohibited to publish data via any medium with the intention to deceive folks on authorities measures to handle Covid-19. We’re due to this fact disabling the remark part on this text so as to defend each the commenting member and ourselves from potential legal responsibility. Ought to you’ve gotten further data that you simply suppose we should always know, please e-mail [email protected].