Additionally it is with readability that I reaffirm the proof I supplied to the Covid-19 Resort Quarantine Board of Inquiry and the Division’s closing submission to the Board.
My proof is emphatic that neither myself nor the Division of Premier and Cupboard decided to make use of non-public safety as a part of the Resort Quarantine Program.
I gave proof that whereas I didn’t recall whether or not I telephoned former Chief Commissioner Graham Ashton in response to a textual content message he despatched me at 1:16pm on 27 March 2020, I’ll have. Additional, I gave proof that though I didn’t recall telephoning Mr Ashton at that specific time, it was my regular apply to get again to the then Chief Commissioner when he contacted me.
Below cross examination I supplied a solution to a associated query that was inconsistent with the totality of my proof and the which means I used to be aspiring to convey. This was not my intention, as I consider was made very clear by my written assertion and additional oral proof. On the time I gave proof I didn’t have in my possession my full phone data.
Following a request by the Board of Inquiry on Saturday 10 October 2020, I requested detailed phone data from my telecommunications provider. These data present I referred to as Mr Ashton at 1:17pm and that I spoke with him for simply over two minutes. At no time previous to 10 October 2020 had the Board requested entry to those phone data, and so they had not beforehand been in my possession.
The phone data don’t in any manner show that I, or certainly anybody else in DPC decided that personal safety be used within the Resort Quarantine Program.
I’m completely sure I didn’t convey to Mr Ashton any choice concerning using non-public safety as I used to be unaware any such choice had been made, and I most definitely had not made such a choice myself.
There was a lot commentary and hypothesis about whether or not I or anybody else at DPC spoke to Mr Ashton throughout that slim timeframe on 27 March. It’s now evident I did.”