How can justice circulate within the Northern Territory when Aboriginal lives are handled with callous indifference? | Thalia Anthony | Opinion

The Northern Territory authorities launched its lengthy overdue draft Aboriginal justice agreement (AJA) this month.

With the very best incarceration charges within the nation (nearly 1,000 prisoners per 100,000 individuals) and the very best proportion of Aboriginal prisoners within the nation (84% of the general jail inhabitants), the Northern Territory AJA is urgently wanted to redress this discriminatory system.


Over the previous two years the NT Aboriginal Justice Unit performed greater than 120 consultations, together with 80 in distant and regional communities, homelands and outstations, and with Aboriginal organisations. A serious discovering from these consultations was that Aboriginal individuals expertise “unconscious bias, discrimination, racism and unfair therapy” within the NT justice system.

Racism was regarded by Aboriginal communities “as an on a regular basis a part of life”. As an illustration, one Aboriginal individual advised the session:


It’s arduous to have a secure neighborhood when police are invisible, uncooperateive or they fail to have a relationship with us.

The session doc discovered that amongst Aboriginal individuals within the NT “there’s a strikingly low degree of empathy in the direction of Aboriginal defendants, prisoners and purchasers by some professionals working within the justice system”.

It outlined issues of frequent racist and derogatory feedback by regulation enforcers about Aboriginal individuals; discrimination by police and correctional providers; failure to supply an interpreter; failure to research issues affecting Aboriginal individuals; failure to supply culturally applicable applications and mistreatment in prisons.


On condition that imprisonment and victimisation undermine Indigenous wellbeing, the AJA generally is a automobile for redressing these points and selling self-determination.

Nevertheless, delivering on its guarantees is not going to be with out main challenges.

Aboriginal self-determination and management has been devastated over the previous decade. Because the federal authorities coverage of the Northern Territory intervention and associated preparations with the NT authorities, Aboriginal individuals have been faraway from their homelands, had their democratically elected neighborhood councils abolished, been topic to distinctive policing powers and had their welfare revenue managed.


There has additionally been a withering away of Aboriginal land rights and the issuing of unprecedented mining and fracking exploration licences. These are main threats to Aboriginal tradition and regulation. The Intervention required the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act because of the overtly racist nature of the legal guidelines, which continues to take a seat uneasily for Aboriginal communities.

The purpose to cut back imprisonment doesn’t gel with the regulation and order stance of the NT Authorities. Insurance policies comparable to obligatory sentencing, paperless arrests and diminished rights to bail stay intact. All these insurance policies have discriminatory impacts of Aboriginal individuals and fly within the face of the AJA goal.

These populist insurance policies, together with elevated police powers because the NT intervention, have contributed to the fast improve in NT incarceration since 2007. Stemming the punitive tide within the NT just isn’t going to be gentle work given the quantity of ammunition successive NT governments have dedicated to its swell.


Successive inquiries have confirmed there’s a lack of accountability for the mistreatment of Aboriginal individuals by police and jail guards.

The royal commission into the protection and detention of children in the NT heard shocking accounts of torture inflicted on younger individuals in NT detention centres. Regardless of its damning findings, the royal fee didn’t lead to any disciplinary motion or prosecutions towards officers, and left many Aboriginal younger individuals regretting their involvement within the course of.

Equally, numerous latest inquiries into Aboriginal deaths in police custody that discovered gross neglect haven’t led to prosecutions or disciplinary motion. This begs the query of how can justice circulate from the AJA when Aboriginal lives are handled with callous indifference.


This lack of accountability additionally options within the remarks made on the NT bench. Decide Greg Borchers on repeated occasions has been criticised for making inappropriate comments about Indigenous offenders, their families and communities, criticising their “laissez-faire parenting”, the abandonment of their kids, and their failure to grasp the “first-world economic system” past authorities handouts.

But the decide stays on the bench and chargeable for deciding Aboriginal individuals’s bail functions, guilt or innocence and sentence.

The AJA should realise its potential if NT Aboriginal communities are to be unshackled from the discriminatory legacy of the legal justice system.


Nevertheless, this can require it to be the governing doc from which all different decision-making within the legal justice system flows. In any other case it’s going to merely function an appendix to a paternalistic regulation and order tome that scripts Northern Territory coverage in the direction of Aboriginal individuals.

  • Thalia Anthony is an affiliate professor in regulation on the College of Know-how Sydney and specialises in racism within the legal justice system

  • Feedback on this piece can be pre-moderated to make sure they keep on subject