Newsom pushes controversial Poseidon desalination plant



When Gov. Gavin Newsom was photographed eating at an opulent Napa Valley restaurant throughout a surge in coronavirus circumstances, many Californians noticed it as hypocrisy. For opponents of a deliberate $1-billion desalination plant alongside the Orange County coast, nevertheless, the optics had been menacing.

The unmasked Newsom was celebrating the birthday of a lobbyist for Poseidon Water, which is near acquiring final government approval for one of many nation’s greatest seawater desalination crops.

Poseidon boasts that the ability will present an area, inexhaustible supply of water for Southern California. Critics complain that Newsom and his political appointees are exerting heavy affect to profit a non-public firm that will produce among the state’s costliest provides.

Emails obtained by The Occasions and the environmental group California Coastkeeper Alliance by means of the state Public Data Act point out that prime California Environmental Safety Company officers have been concerned in a water board’s assessment of the complicated proposal. As well as, Newsom took the weird step of changing a Santa Ana Regional Water High quality Management Board member who was extremely vital of the venture.

Although the Huntington Seashore facility meets the state aim of diversifying California’s water provide, it will undermine different environmental insurance policies. The plant would require massive quantities of electrical energy; it will sit subsequent to a rising sea; and it will proceed using large ocean intakes dangerous to microscopic marine life.

“The Governor has spoken many instances concerning the significance of … guaranteeing the sustainability of California’s water provides,” Newsom’s workplace mentioned in a press release. “Areas throughout California should proceed to innovate on native initiatives as local weather change makes our state’s water provide extra unpredictable.”

Two folks acquainted with the approval course of say employees on the water board, which would want to situation a allow for Poseidon’s ocean consumption and discharge operations earlier than the corporate can go to the California Coastal Fee for closing approval, have been beneath intense strain to advance the proposal.

Throughout three days of on-line hearings in July and August, board members questioned whether or not there was a necessity for the water provides Poseidon would supply, noting that the corporate has but to lock in a agency purchaser for the 50 million gallons a day the plant would produce.

The hardest questions got here from William Von Blasingame, a retired energy firm government whose second time period on the board was about to run out.

With the board’s resolution nonetheless pending, Newsom’s workplace introduced on Oct. 21 that the governor would substitute Von Blasingame with Letitia Clark, a Tustin Metropolis Council member who acquired marketing campaign contributions from pro-Poseidon labor teams throughout her 2020 reelection marketing campaign.

“As soon as once more I believe the governor stepped in,” mentioned Karl Seckel, an Orange County water official. “It appeared slightly clear that he didn’t need Von Blasingame concerned in that call.”

In an interview with The Occasions, Von Blasingame mentioned he was shocked that Newsom didn’t preserve him.

“To vary somebody within the closing days of deliberation appeared to be extremely uncommon,” he mentioned.

Newsom’s workplace mentioned the governor “rigorously evaluations all appointments and has made many modifications throughout his administration over the previous two years to herald new members to supply recent perspective.” Newsom is assured Clark “will characterize her group’s pursuits in decision-making on the board,” the assertion continued.

Whereas the venture listening to was underway final summer season, based on data, Cal EPA Secretary Jared Blumenfeld additionally referred to as and texted three different board members, contacts that Poseidon opponents say violated state legislation.

The communications, which Blumenfeld defends as correct, had been disclosed recently by the board.

Within the texts and telephone calls to board members Kris Murray, Joseph Kerr and Lana Ong Peterson, Blumenfeld didn’t inform them find out how to vote. However based on the disclosures — by which the three recount ex parte communications with Blumenfeld exterior of formal proceedings — he burdened that the board had a vital resolution to make.

He requested when the board would vote, puzzled how the assembly — which was livestreamed — was going and talked about the administration’s simply launched Water Resilience Portfolio.

In a press release, Cal EPA mentioned it was the job of Blumenfeld and Deputy Secretary Kristin Peer “to be in common contact and coordination with Regional Water Board employees and members on a wide range of issues. Secretary Blumenfeld reached out to a few members of the Santa Ana Board to supply his workplace’s help and it was subsequently decided, out of an abundance of warning, that these conversations would profit from being positioned into the general public report.”

The resilience portfolio was one of many matters on which Poseidon has lobbied the administration and governor’s workplace.

Over the past two years, the corporate paid lobbying companies a complete of $839,000 to characterize its pursuits in Sacramento, based on secretary of state data.

The majority of that sum, $575,000, went to Axiom Advisors, the agency headed by longtime Newsom good friend Jason Kinney, whose French Laundry birthday dinner Newsom attended.

Poseidon’s pursuit of state approvals hasn’t been confined to lobbying. E mail exchanges by the regional board employees present that firm Vice President Scott Maloni has repeatedly inserted himself into employees enterprise.

In a single e mail, Maloni provided “some recommendations that may assist employees in responding to potential Board member questions that might come up” at a March 2020 assembly.

In one other, he requested board government officer Hope Smythe to incorporate a selected slide in its March presentation that may “proactively alleviate any Boardmember questions or issues” concerning the want for the Poseidon provides.

When the March assembly was canceled due to COVID-19, Maloni demanded “to know employees’s plans to course right and the ensuing schedule.”

An April e mail change between two state water board scientists who had been engaged on the desalination venture additionally mentions a “poseidon assembly on the Governor’s workplace.”

The e-mail data embody quite a few scheduling messages for calls and on-line conferences involving board employees and Peer, a Newsom appointee who’s Cal EPA’s particular counsel for water coverage.

Peer scheduled one “check-in” on-line assembly for Aug. 6, the eve of the third day of the Poseidon listening to at which it had been anticipated the board would vote. Together with Smythe and two state water board officers, Peer invited Maloni and Poseidon Senior Vice President Peter MacLaggan.

After one other spherical of discussions on Aug. 7, board members determined to proceed the listening to as a result of they’d lingering questions on facets of the venture, together with the adequacy of Poseidon’s plans to mitigate the ecological hurt of its ocean consumption with environmental restoration work.

After a September date was scheduled after which canceled, Smythe proposed persevering with the listening to on Oct. 15.

Maloni, who earlier within the 12 months had chafed beneath COVID-related delays, replied that the corporate wanted extra time to digest new mitigation data. “We don’t suppose a mid-October listening to is achievable,” he wrote. It didn’t happen.

In early November, data present that Blumenfeld scheduled a “check-in on Poseidon” convention name with Peer, Maloni and a state board lawyer.

Board members are anticipated to return to the Poseidon venture in April, when they may take into account modifications within the proposed allow, together with extra environmental mitigation necessities.

One factor that hasn’t modified is a situation that the corporate get hold of all essential approvals for the environmental work earlier than it may possibly function the desalter.

Poseidon argues that the supply will stretch out the venture timeline and hinder financing. The corporate proposed various language dropping the situation, which the employees included within the allow package deal for the board’s consideration.

In a press release, Maloni mentioned the amended allow will increase the variety of coastal habitat initiatives from three to 5 and the restored habitat from 21 acres to 84 acres. He added that the listening to wanted to be postponed final fall as a result of Poseidon lacked particular particulars of the brand new mitigation necessities.

“We’re happy with the clear and inclusive course of and look ahead to the Regional Board’s adoption of the allow,” Maloni mentioned.

To venture opponents, the regional board emails paint a transparent image.

“Confronted with an uphill battle to get the required votes, Poseidon … requested for the October adoption listening to to be postponed in order that the governor had time to take away member Von Blasingame from the decision-making course of,” contended Sean Bothwell, government director of the California Coastkeeper Alliance.

“With a extra favorable board, Poseidon is now lobbying exhausting for a ‘get out of jail free’ card that can enable the venture to start working earlier than all the required permits are obtained to mitigate the numerous air pollution and marine life impacts it’s going to create.”